Still according to this citizen, it would be a bad idea to enlarge the cottage at the risk of losing its characteristics which testify to the built heritage of Outremont. In fact, according to Pierre-Richard Bisson’s study on the built and landscape heritage of the borough, which was started in 1988 and whose report was submitted in February 1993, the cottage is of definite heritage interest for 3 reasons
- rarity: the chalet is one of the first examples of the use of stucco as an exterior cladding material, a novelty introduced in Outremont by the chalet’s architect, Aristide Beaugrand-Champagne;
- longevity: located in the heart of the park for almost a century (96 years in 2021), the rural character of the building gives the impression of being away from the city and gives it a unique appearance;
- the contribution to the harmony of the environment: its location away from the park is not insignificant, because in addition to being an architect, Aristide Beaugrand-Champagne was also a landscaper. He wished, in doing so, to draw the attention of the passerby to the two works present in the park, namely “the fountain, installed in 1916, and the monument to the memory of the soldiers fallen in the First World War, inaugurated in July 1925.”
In conclusion of her opinion letter, Ms. Asencio rightly points out that any modification to the architecture of the current chalet would undermine the memorial and heritage value of this exceptional building, which would be “irretrievable” to quote her. Instead, it is proposed that the borough should begin restoration work that respects the character of the building with original materials as soon as possible, in order to prevent it from deteriorating further and reaching a point of no return, where demolition would be the only option. A petition launched by the group Les résidents d’Outremont pour la démocratie, addressed to the borough’s mayor, Philippe Tomlinson, is currently online (as of February 1, 2021) and aims to collect 5,000 signatures in order to “defend Outremont Park in order to safeguard both its bucolic character and its exceptional historical value.”
Source : La Presse +, section Débats, January 18, 2021 (in French)